happy to see this moving forward to a proposal state!! I like and support using gardens.fund as a governance mechanism, as explained in the Temp Check post, I’m also aware that token distribution policies would play a huge role into the success of CV as a governance mechanism.
so I’m wondering how that funding pool and token distribution policies would actually incentivize allo protocol builders to keep building with both alignment and coherence!
I’m sure this is something that will came up during the community workshop, as lead of an allocation mechanism project (see Bootstrapping an Organization through p2p accounting mechanisms) I’ll look forward to be there.
I do have a concern tho regarding point 2:
what if the desired governance token (I’d expect it’s distribution policies to be an outcome of organizational processes in 1.) would actually need some development? shouldn’t we consider an extra budget and timeline here? 0.5 ETH and 1 months seems to be too short for the case in which the community signals a need of an extra bit of complexity beyond selecting a regular token template.