that makes sense, still, that’s really subjective and hard to measure. Yes, we can have OKRs and KPIs and reward contributors based deterministic reach of those outcomes. Still, not everything is deterministic when we are pondering the value of contributors. e.g. weavers, project managers, Public Relationships, community leading, researchers… Lot of the value produced in any organization is subjective and stochastic, and Collabberry does provide a p2p compensation algorithm for outputting an objective metric from the intersubjective considerantions of value from a team of contributors (similar to the mechanisms that markets use to bring a price as an objective measure of value).
A token will be needed, yes, and again, deciding on an arbitrary one (e.g. GTC) can bring externalities that would cause missalignments between the purpose of Allo and the way decisions are being made. And this is precisely the problem we solve at Collabberry, we do align distribution with the merits that buiders build on themselves regarding their alignment with the project and its goals. If you have the time, Afo, please read this research paper on Compensation in early-stage teams (this is the motivation for Collabberry to exist), I trust you will see the benefits in placing using Collabberry as the protocol for minting co-ownsership/governance tokens. I do have the hypothesis (and I suspect @paul might be understanding this as well) that using Collabberry in conjunction with Gardens will solve many (if not all) of the challenges I mentioned about Conviction Voting learnings from the past.
to be precise, Collabberry won’t be managing Allo Capital contributions, that’s up to the contributors themself and to the governance they decide to follow; the scope of Collabberry is to continuously mint and distribute erc20 tokens for rewarding contributors. Think of it as a Dynamic Sweat Equity Allocation protocol (while also monetary compensations in stables or bluechip tokens when needed). This demo might bring further clarifications.
Collabberry don’t do governance, we provide a solution for minting governance tokens based on the socially validated value of contributors.
Do we want to bring GTC to value within the community? It actually makes sense, not as the sole primitive tho, we can design and develop the proper market mechanisms to bring GTC (e.g.) as another primitive for getting our own $ALLO, but that’s a degree of complexity I’m not kind to bring to this conversation now.