[Research Raid #1] - Call to Adventure - Ethereum Biggest Problems

Chat-GPT-Image-10-de-mai-de-2025-23-42-50.png

Welcome, Explorers and Alchemists.

You’ve just stumbled into a coordination experiment disguised as a research program.

The Cookie Jar Research Raid.

This is our attempt to unlock community-driven capital allocation research.

Your mission:
Explore the domain of on-chain coordination. Return with insights that can make Allo flow :droplet:


WTF Research Raid?

Research Raids are seasonal, time-boxed research sprints that will seek to turn collective intelligence into coordination infrastructure for Ethereum-aligned ecosystems.

This Raid will be a 6-week research sprint, where selected Explorers and Alchemists will dive into allocators pain points, coordination frictions, and UX blockers. Returning with insights, prototypes, and artifacts to evolve Ethereum’s public goods stack and TVF outcomes. This raid is governed by conviction voting on Gardens, and uses a weekly Cookie Jar to fund a small cohort of researchers that will:

  1. Explore research prompts
  2. Share insights
  3. Produce artifacts that unblock real capital flow
  4. Seed reusable refined prompts, emergent patterns, and prototypes for future builders and buildings

Chat-GPT-Image-11-de-mai-de-2025-03-01-24.png


Roles

Role Core Function Weekly Commitment
Explorer Deep-dive into one Research Track prompt; produce outputs 5–6 h
Alchemist Sense-make across Tracks; weave insights; Raid OS Stewardship 5–6 h

Research Tracks

The research raid is designed around three exploration tracks and one alchemy track. These prompts frame the big questions we aim to answer. Explorers will tackle the track prompts in the Explorer Circle thread, and Alchemists will synthesize insights in the Alchemist Circle thread.

Exploration

Each Explorer chooses one of the following three tracks. These tracks are aligned with allocator archetypes and Ethereum’s most urgent coordination problems. Their quest is to narrow the prompt into a sharp question and return with artifacts that can unlock Total Value Flow (TVF).

Track 1: Allocator Pain Mapping & Signal Architectures

Prompt:
How do different types of allocators (DAO stewards, ReFi leads, NGOs, L2 teams) experience friction in making capital allocation decisions. And what kinds of signals help them trust where to send funds?

Why it matters:
This track supports the “broad listening” challenge. Understanding allocator perception is key to designing mechanisms that move real capital.

Sub-questions you might explore:

  • What makes a coordination effort legible to funders?
  • How do allocators differ in their readiness to act on signals?
  • What patterns emerge in ecosystem “cold spots” where good work goes unfunded?

Track 2: Growth, Activation & Strategic Readiness

Prompt:
What conditions make an ecosystem (e.g. DeSci hub, ReFi group, city DAO) “funding-ready”? And how can we detect and support these inflection points before they fade?

Why it matters:
This track aligns with vertical adoption efforts from Allo, Gitcoin, and the Ethereum Foundation. Especially around sustaining momentum in emerging ecosystems.

Sub-questions you might explore:

  • What signal mix precedes successful rounds or pilots?
  • When do ecosystems stall despite capital or talent?
  • What does “shipping velocity” look like in practice?

Track 3: Product & Mechanism R&D (UX, Coordination, Interop)

Prompt:
Where are developers and contributors dropping off in the Ethereum coordination stack? And what UX, mechanism, or protocol designs could reduce those frictions without adding overhead?

Why it matters:
UX is one of EF’s core priorities. Understanding contributor pain and reducing coordination overhead is key to ecosystem resilience.

Sub-questions you might explore:

  • What barriers stop new contributors from maintaining open infra?
  • What types of stateless flows can reduce user fatigue?
  • What lessons can we borrow from Solana, Stellar, or NEAR app flows?

Alchemy

Alchemists don’t pick a Track, they track the Tracks. This prompt asks them to surface the design patterns, coordination insights, and infrastructure upgrades that emerge as the Raid unfolds. Their job is to spot systemic learnings and make them useful not just now, but for future Raids and funding experiments.

Meta track: Evolving the Raid OS

Prompt:
How might we design the Cookie Jar Raid OS to unlock 10× researcher throughput and TVF?

Why it matters:

  • Supports deeper application-layer infrastructure design
  • Resonates with EF’s focus on UX, coordination, and governance
  • Helps Allo, Gitcoin, and others evolve intent-based capital flow
  • Serves ecosystem stewards looking for reusable research systems

Sub-questions to explore

  • What design patterns or blockers are recurring across Tracks?
  • How might prompts evolve into products, patterns, or new roles?
  • When do meta-items actually reduce friction, and when do they add it?
  • How do we know when a research insight is TVF-relevant or funding-ready?
  • How should we version rules, approve changes, and assess impact, through TVF and other metrics?
  • Where can smart-contracts, bots, EAS, or templates replace manual bottlenecks?
  • Which raid rules & meta-items drive the most collaboration value, and which add noise?
  • Quorum & voting on rules – Hypercert weight schema – TVF research rubric

Rewards

  • Each selected participant receives 0.08 ETH / week from the Cookie Jar.
  • Weekly updates links (Circle Threads and replies) are required to claim.
  • Missed updates = 1 week - forfeited payout for that week, 2 weeks - removed by the Raid Council

How can you participate?

  • Choose your role
  • Submit your proposal in one of the 2 signaling Pools created on Gitcoin Grants Garden
    • Explorers Pool
    • Alchemists Pool
  • Allo NFT holders and Allominati Circle allowlisted to vote.
  • Ranked conviction voting determine the results:
    • Top 4 Explorers
    • Top 3 Alchemists

Selection will favor:

  • Alignment with Allo’s real-world questions and strategy
  • Clear scoping and realistic deliverables
  • Creativity and praticality

Forum Threads

To track everything, we’ll use three main threads:

  • [Research Raid #1] – Call to Adventure – Ethereum’s Biggest Problems
  • [Research Raid #1] – Explorers Circle - Will be posted after selection
  • [Research Raid #1] – Alchemists Circle Will be posted after selection

These will be the official hubs for weekly updates, meta-item usage, and shared discoveries.


Timeline

  • July 21 – Call to Adventure
  • Aug 05 – Gardens selection ends
  • Aug 06 – Raid Begins
  • September 20 – Raid Chronicle published

Meta-Items

Meta-items are specific processes designed to reduce friction and unlock collective intelligence. For this Raid, here’s what’s live:

Meta-Item Function Who Can Use It Activation Protocol
:rescue_worker_s_helmet: Research Aid Call Alchemists for help, feedback, or peer review. Tag @Alchemists in your post. Explorers Tag in your thread when you need signal support.
:flashlight: Signal Beacon Launch a lightweight sensemaking tool (poll, Slido, form). Alchemists Community outreach + summary in Alchemist Circle.
:feather: Prompt Fragment Post a distilled research insight or prompt seed. May evolve into future raid themes. Alchemists Post directly in the Alchemists Circle.
:man_mage: Call the Wizard Schedule a 30-min call with Kevin (or a designated Wizard). Max 3 per raid. Alchemists Tag @owocki in the Alchemist Circle to coordinate.
:clinking_beer_mugs: Party Propose a co-working or brainstorm session to align or energize the group. Explorers and Alchemists Share time, agenda, and host info in either Circle.

What To Include in Your Proposal (via Gardens Pools)

  • Your research focus or synthesis intent
  • What track (or lane) you’ll contribute to
  • What artifact(s) you plan to produce
  • Impact Statement (Example: “If adopted, this work could unlock $X of value for Y allocator group, by Z mechanism.”)
  • A TVF Reflection will be required at the end of the raid from all participants.

Ready to enter the Raid? :scroll:

Get the templates below, submit your proposal in the respective Garden pool, and get ready to blaze a trail.

Explorers Submission Pool :magnifying_glass_tilted_right:

## Explorer Application
[Telegram or Discord Handle] 
[Your Wallet]

**1. Track you're applying to (pick one):**  
[ ] Track 1 – Allocator Pain Mapping & Signal Architectures  
[ ] Track 2 – Growth, Activation & Strategic Readiness  
[ ] Track 3 – Product & Mechanism R&D (UX, Coordination, Interop)

**2. Why this track excites you (max 4 sentences):**  
Tell us why this question matters to you. What drives your curiosity here?

**3. Relevant experience:**  
Any work, research, or contributions that show you’re ready for this topic. Links welcome.

**4. Research approach (3 bullet outline):**  
How do you plan to explore this question? Interviews, dashboards, diagrams, forum archeology, etc.

**5. Intended output format:**  
What form will your final artifact take? Report, prototype, Figma flow, data viz, strategy brief, etc.

**6. Impact Statement (max 150 words):**  
If adopted, how might this research unlock future value flow? Who benefits, and how?

Alchemists Submission Pool :test_tube:

## Alchemist Application 
[Telegram or Discord Handle] 
[Your Wallet]

**1. Why this excites you (max 4 sentences):**  
What draws you to sensemaking, research synthesis, and meta-level insight work?

**2. Which evidence base are more you focused on?**
[ ] Allocator Archetypes (Allo)  
[ ] Ethereum’s Biggest Problems (Gitcoin + EF forum sensemaking)

**3. Relevant experience:**  
Share examples of your research, facilitation, systems thinking, or coordination background. Include links if helpful.

**4. Meta-Track focus (1–2 sentences):**  
What aspect of the funding coordination problem are you most curious to synthesize across?

**5. Weekly synthesis flow (3 bullets):**  
How will you track, connect, and surface patterns? (e.g. forum scanning, prompt harvesting, visual frameworks, workshop recaps)

**6. Meta-items you’re excited to test:**  
Which of the following meta-items will you think you'll lean first on and how do you expect to use them?  (Signal Beacon · Prompt Fragment · Call the Wizard · Party)

**7. Impact Statement (max 150 words):**  
If selected, how might this research unlock future value for the Raid? Who benefits, and how?

Resources to Explore Before Applying


2 Likes

Hey y’all,

I wanted to share a few reflections about the purpose and direction of this research quest I’ve been designing.

From the beginning, the goal has been to create something the community can appropriate and evolve — not a top-down project, but a shared framework that others can fork and refine. So i’m intentionally focusing on pattern language and alignment over ownership or control.

One thing I’ve been reconsidering is the use of Raid Guild-style branding and the term “Raid” itself. At first, it felt like a natural connection — helping bridge the Cookie Jar Research concept with @T_W’s Castles & Raids, and also with the creators of the tool we’re using. But it’s become clear that this framing might cause confusion, especially around the expectations it sets.


Updates I’m considering:

1. Extending the timeline + broadening participation

Instead of selecting a few participants, I’d like to open up the process:

  • Mint a Cookie Jar Research token to acknowledge contribution.
    Anyone who meaningfully contributes to the sprint can claim it.
  • Let the community propose roles instead of predefining them.
    Each role would have:
    • a symbolic name (e.g. Keeper, Driver)
    • a purpose (ideal vision)
    • minimal responsibilities
    • relevant artifacts
  • Expand meta-items into onchain signals.
    Example: use a Sarafu pool to let people mint vouchers. These + the research token could be swapped for goods/services.

2. Renaming the sprint

To avoid branding overlap with Raid Guild, I propose:
Cookie Jar Research Raid → Cookie Jar Research Quest


Would love to hear your thoughts. Open to further input before we update the call and structure.

See you on the space, peace. :victory_hand:

2 Likes

Updated Call & Resources

Hello Allo community,

We’re excited to share some important updates about our research initiative. Originally launched as the Cookie Jar Research Raid, this program is evolving into Allo Research Quests (ARQ). Below you’ll find details on the new timeline, selection process, funding structure, and reading materials to help you craft a strong proposal.

What’s changing?

  • New name: So we’re adopting the name - Allo Research Quests (ARQ).

  • Extended deadline: To allow more teams to participate, the application deadline has been extended to 15 August 2025.

  • New Kickoff date - August 16

Opening Participation and Commitments

For future interations

  • We’re exploring how a utility token ($ARQ) could create a more broad and inclusive process, where we recognize a diverse set of contributions upfront and coordinate incentives with an ecosystem approach.
    • Simplified selection process: Instead of a complex review, we plan to use a signaling pool as registry in an ARQ Gardens community to prioritize proposals. This process will govern interactions between the Cookie Jar mechanism, vouchers, and Sarafu liquidity pools.
    • Sarafu pools integration: We envision two Sarafu pools—one for matched funding and one for community commitment tokens.
      • Retroactive funding through liquidity to distribute resources in a regenerative, ecosystemic manner.

Additional Resources

To help you ground your proposals in solid theory and practice, we’ve compiled a list of peer‑reviewed articles and reports.

Topic Reference & Link Why it matters
Design Science for IS research “Design Science in Information Systems Research” by Hevner et al. (2004) – MISQ article Explains how design science extends human and organisational capabilities through the creation and evaluation of artefacts. Provides guidelines for executing and assessing research prototypes.
Data governance frameworks “Data Governance: A Conceptual Framework, Structured Review, and Research Agenda” by Abraham et al. (2019) – International Journal of Information Management Defines data governance as the exercise of authority and control over data, aiming to increase its value and reduce risks. Offers a six‑dimensional framework and identifies key research questions.
Public funding allocation “Science policies: How should science funding be allocated?” by Meirmans et al. (2019) – PMC article Argues for a targeted funding strategy that balances small grants for many with a few large interdisciplinary awards. Discusses advantages of both consortia and individual-led projects and emphasises long‑term research.
Crypto‑economic evaluation of grant programs “Crypto‑Economic Analysis of Web3 Funding Programs Using the Grant Maturity Framework” by Biedermann et al. (2025) – ArXiv (summary here) Introduces the Grant Maturity Framework (GMF), a mixed‑methods rubric for evaluating Web3 grant programs. Demonstrates how the GMF informs improvements to grant platforms and highlights variations across L2 ecosystems.
Regenerative finance & governance “An Evaluation of the Regenerative Claims of Web3’s ReFi Movement” by Jung et al. (2025) – Frontiers in Blockchain Finds that many ReFi projects are still centralized, with community participation limited to implementation. Points out gaps in transparency and alignment between token design, governance and ecological outcomes.

Your participation and feedback are critical. Whether you’re an academic, developer, designer, or community organiser, we encourage you to review the materials, refine your ideas, and submit your proposal, the top proposals by 15 August 2025 will be selected.

If you want to contribute to the design of the new process, with the $ARQ token, and Sarafu pools, please reply to this thread or reach out to via DM on telegram @growecosystems.

Excited about the proposals we’re already receiving. Let’s make the Allo Flow! :droplet:

5 Likes

:rocket: Allo Research Quests Pilot – Cohort Selected & Kickoff Call :seedling:

Hello Allo community,

The selection process is complete — we now have 4 Explorers and 3 Alchemists ready to embark on the very first Allo Research Quest (ARQ) Pilot.

Over the next 6 weeks, this cohort will explore, synthesize, and prototype new pathways for Web3 capital coordination. They’ll share their progress in their own circle thread and put the link in their Claim Notes, tracking the work weekly, creating visibility and collective learning for the community.


:sparkles: Congratulations to the Cohort

Alchemists

- @forkinWisdom

- @JoyMutheu

- @durgadas

Explorers

- @CorduroyEarth

-@DiogoJ

- @TrinityMorphy

- @alwynvanwyk


:scroll: Proposals

- Alchemists → Alchemists Proposals - Forkin, Joy and Durgadas - Google Docs

- Explorers → Explorers Proposals - Lliam, Diogo, Trinity, Alwyin - Google Docs )


:date: Kickoff Call

We’ll align as a group and officially open the Exploration Jar on:

Monday, Aug 18, 2025

:backhand_index_pointing_right: Join via Luma - ALLO RESEARCH QUEST #1 - KICKOFF CALL · Luma


For those who didn’t get selected this time: my biggest thanks for putting your ideas forward. Every proposal contributed to mapping the landscape of what ARQ can become, and it wasn’t easy to make the final call with so many strong directions.

This is just the first Quest. There will be more cycles, more opportunities, and more space to experiment together. We’d love to see you join the kickoff call, follow the Cookie Notes, and keep shaping the future of this research hyperstructure with us. :seedling:

Your participation is key:

- Join the kickoff call

- Review proposals & updates

- Signal support

- Share resources

Let’s make the Allo Flow :droplet:

5 Likes

great! very excited about this :smiley:

3 Likes

Thank you Coi, pumped up for ARQ C1.

As stated in the submitted proposal, @kentbabinkentbabin and I will be working together to develop a framework to determine funding readiness for ReFi/Regen projects.

Give our individual extensive experience in ReFi, we are following the “two heads are better than one” idiom to deliver an actionable and effective output.

1 Like

Thanks @Coi and Allominati. Looking forward to building Ethereum coordination infrastructure!

1 Like

thank you @Coi , looking forward to the call on monday

1 Like

Fantastic to have an opportunity to focus on something that is a major pain-point for everyone in this space, in my opinion. If nothing else, it will help to resolve a major issue for me.

1 Like

We’re excited to be part of the Explorers group!

1 Like